Testing & Quality Checks

Test Framework Auto-Detector & Generator

Detects which test framework a project already uses (Jest, Vitest, Pytest, Go testing, and more) and writes new tests in that project's existing style, not a generic template.

Last updated Jul 11, 2026
FreeClaudeClaude CodeCursorGitHub Copilot
TL;DR

Test Framework Auto-Detector & Generator is a free AI skill for testing & quality checks. Detects which test framework a project already uses (Jest, Vitest, Pytest, Go testing, and more) and writes new tests in that project's existing style, not a generic template. It works with Claude, Claude Code, Cursor and is ready to use out of the box.

Download Skill.md Package

About this skill

Generic AI-written tests often use the wrong framework, the wrong assertion style, or ignore existing test file conventions entirely, so they get rewritten by hand anyway. This skill inspects the project first — package.json, config files, existing test files, import statements — to identify the framework and its conventions (naming pattern, mocking approach, setup/teardown style, assertion library), then writes new tests that look like they belong in the codebase. It covers unit, integration, and basic end-to-end cases, and flags untestable code (tight coupling, hidden side effects) instead of writing a hollow test around it.

What it does

Given a file or function to test, the skill first identifies the testing framework already in use by inspecting config and existing test files, matches its naming and structure conventions, then generates unit tests covering the happy path, edge cases, and error conditions using the project's actual assertion and mocking style — instead of defaulting to a generic framework the project doesn't use.

What is included

  • Full SKILL.md with the framework-detection checklist (config files, imports, existing test patterns)
  • Convention-matching guide: naming, file placement, mocking style, assertion library per framework
  • Edge-case and error-path checklist to run before writing a test, so coverage isn't just the happy path
  • Guidance for flagging untestable code instead of writing a test that doesn't actually verify behavior
  • Worked example: detecting Vitest from a React project and generating a matching test file

How to use it

1. Download the test-framework-auto-detector-generator-SKILL.md file
2. Add it to your agent's skills folder (e.g. .claude/skills/ for Claude Code) or upload it in a Claude.ai/Cursor chat
3. Point it at a file or function and ask for tests
4. Review the generated tests, which should already match your project's existing framework and conventions

Examples

Example input
Write tests for this function. [pastes a calculateDiscount function from a project that already uses Vitest with React Testing Library]
Example output
Detected framework: Vitest, based on vitest.config.ts and existing *.test.tsx files using describe/it and @testing-library conventions. Generated a matching test file covering: standard discount calculation, zero and negative input handling, discount caps above 100%, and a missing-price argument case — using the same describe/it structure and expect() assertions as the rest of the test suite, plus a note that the function currently swallows invalid input silently rather than throwing, which is worth a look.

FAQ

Which frameworks does it detect?
Jest, Vitest, Pytest, Go's built-in testing package, and it can reason about others (RSpec, JUnit, etc.) from config and existing test file conventions even if not explicitly pre-programmed.
What if my project has no tests yet?
It falls back to checking config files and package manifests to infer the intended framework, and asks if genuinely ambiguous rather than guessing silently.
Does it just test the happy path?
No — it works through edge cases and error conditions as a checklist, and calls out any input space it couldn't reasonably cover.
Will it write a test around code that's hard to test?
It flags the underlying testability problem (tight coupling, hidden side effects, global state) instead of writing a shallow test that passes without verifying real behavior.
Does this replace a human code reviewer?
No — it produces solid first-draft test coverage in your project's own style, which a reviewer can then check, rather than replacing review entirely.
Can it update existing tests instead of only writing new ones?
Yes — point it at an existing test file and a changed function, and it will extend the existing tests to cover the new behavior in the same style.

Related Skills

Testing & Quality ChecksFree

QA Test Case Generator

Generates a structured set of test cases — happy path, edge cases, and negative tests — from a feature description or user story.

ClaudeChatGPTCursor
#qa#test-cases#software-testing
Testing & Quality ChecksFree

Automated Test Suite Architect

Design maintainable automated test suites with test layers, boundaries, fixtures, mocks, coverage goals, CI execution, and ownership.

ClaudeChatGPTCursor
#automated testing#test architecture#unit testing
Testing & Quality ChecksFree

Role Based Access Control Test Planner

Plan role-based access-control testing with users, roles, permissions, resources, inheritance, escalation, revocation, audit, and negative tests.

ClaudeChatGPT
#RBAC testing#authorization QA#access control

Related Prompts

Free

Edge Case & Test Case Generator

Analyzes a function or feature and generates a comprehensive list of edge cases and corresponding test cases, catching scenarios developers commonly miss.

ClaudeChatGPT
#testing#edge-cases#unit-tests
Free

AI Prompt Evaluation Suite Designer

Design a rigorous evaluation suite for testing a prompt or AI feature before shipping, covering edge cases, grading criteria, and regression tracking.

ClaudeChatGPT
#prompt engineering#ai evaluation#testing