Coding & Debugging Prompts

Root Cause Bug Investigator

Guides a systematic investigation of a bug from symptom to root cause, avoiding quick patches that mask the real problem, and produces a targeted fix.

FreeClaudeChatGPT
Best for

Developers debugging tricky issues who want a structured diagnostic process instead of guessing-and-checking, especially for bugs that have resisted a first attempted fix.

Suitable LLM groups
FrontierReasoning
Download Prompt.md
Prompt
You are a senior engineer known for finding the actual root cause of bugs instead of patching symptoms.

Bug description (what's happening vs. what should happen): {{bug_description}}
Relevant code: {{code_snippet_or_file}}
Error message/logs (if any): {{error_logs}}
What I've already tried: {{attempted_fixes}}

Do the following:
1. List the most likely root causes ranked by probability, based on the symptom, code, and logs (not just the first plausible guess).
2. For the top-ranked cause, trace through the exact execution path that leads to the bug, referencing specific lines or logic in the provided code.
3. Propose a fix that addresses the root cause, not just the symptom, and explain why it's more durable than a surface-level patch (e.g., adding a null check versus fixing why the null occurs in the first place).
4. Suggest one test case that would have caught this bug before it reached this point, so it doesn't resurface elsewhere.

How to use

  1. Describe the bug clearly: what's happening versus what should happen.
  2. Paste the relevant code and any error logs or console output.
  3. Mention what you've already tried so the investigation doesn't repeat dead ends.
  4. Apply the root-cause fix rather than any quick patches suggested along the way, and add the recommended test case.

Example input

Bug: A form submits successfully sometimes but silently fails other times with no error shown. Code: [React form component with an async submit handler]. Error logs: Console shows an unhandled promise rejection intermittently. Attempted fixes: Added a try/catch around the submit call, didn't help.

Example output

A ranked list of likely causes (race condition in state updates ranked highest, followed by an unawaited async call), a traced execution path showing the submit handler doesn't await a nested API call before checking success state, a fix adding a proper await and moving the try/catch to wrap the actual async operation rather than the outer function, and a suggested test case simulating a slow network response to catch the race condition.

Customization tips

  • For intermittent/flaky bugs, mention that explicitly so the investigation prioritizes race conditions and timing issues over deterministic logic errors.
  • If you suspect a specific cause but aren't sure, state your hypothesis so it can be confirmed or ruled out explicitly.
  • For production bugs, ask for the fix to include a rollback-safe version if the root cause requires a larger refactor.

Tags

#debugging#root-cause-analysis#bug-fixing#code-review#software-engineering

FAQ

What is this prompt for?
It guides a systematic bug investigation from symptom to root cause, ranks likely causes, traces the actual execution path, and proposes a durable fix along with a test case to prevent recurrence.
How should I customize it?
Provide the actual code, error logs, and what you've already tried, since a vague bug description without code will only produce generic debugging advice rather than a specific diagnosis.
Are there any limitations?
The diagnosis is based only on the code and context provided; bugs involving external systems, environment-specific state, or data not shown may need additional investigation beyond this analysis.
How is it different from a basic prompt?
Instead of jumping to the first plausible fix, it ranks multiple root cause hypotheses, traces the specific execution path for the top one, and explicitly distinguishes a symptom patch from a durable root-cause fix.
Free

Code Review Simulator

Simulates a thorough senior engineer code review, flagging bugs, edge cases, readability issues, and security concerns with specific, actionable comments.

ClaudeChatGPT
#code-review#debugging#software-engineering
Free

Legacy Code Explainer & Refactor Planner

Explains what an unfamiliar or legacy piece of code actually does, then proposes a safe, incremental refactor plan instead of a risky full rewrite.

ClaudeChatGPT
#legacy-code#refactoring#code-review
Free

Flaky Test Root Cause Analyzer

Investigate nondeterministic tests by classifying failure patterns, controlling hidden inputs, and designing a reproducible fix.

ClaudeChatGPT
#flaky-tests#test-reliability#nondeterminism

Related Skills

Code ImprovementFree

Code Refactor Advisor

Reviews a code snippet and returns a prioritized refactor plan — readability, structure, and performance issues, each with a concrete fix.

ClaudeChatGPTCursor
#code-review#refactoring#clean-code
Code ImprovementFree

Debugging and Root Cause Analyst

Investigate software defects systematically using evidence, hypotheses, reproduction, instrumentation, isolation, and verification.

ClaudeChatGPTCursor
#debugging#root cause analysis#bug investigation
Code ImprovementFree

Code Review & Refactor Assistant

Reviews a pasted code snippet for bugs, readability, and performance issues, then delivers a prioritized refactor with explanations for each change.

ClaudeChatGPTCursor
#code review#refactoring#software engineering

Related Articles

Article · Testing & Quality Checks

How to Test AI-Generated Code Before You Trust It

Learn how to review and test AI-generated code before using it in production, including functionality, security, edge cases, permissions, and regression checks.

Jul 5, 20268 min read
Read How to Test AI-Generated Code Before You Trust It