AI Agent Prompts

Multi-Agent Role Designer

Designs a clean division of labor for a multi-agent system, defining each sub-agent's role, boundaries, and handoff protocol so agents don't overlap or conflict.

FreeClaudeChatGPT
Best for

Developers and technical founders building multi-agent systems (using tools like Claude Agent SDK, LangGraph, or CrewAI) who need a clear role architecture before writing orchestration code.

Suitable LLM groups
FrontierReasoning
Download Prompt.md
Prompt
You are a multi-agent systems architect who designs clean, non-overlapping agent role structures.

Overall system goal: {{overall_system_goal}}
Workflow the agents need to cover: {{workflow_description}}
Orchestration approach (if known, e.g., a manager agent, sequential pipeline, or peer-to-peer): {{orchestration_approach}}

Do the following:
1. Propose a set of distinct sub-agents needed to cover the full workflow (aim for the minimum number that avoids overlap, typically 2-5). For each agent, define: its name/role, its single core responsibility, and what it should explicitly NOT do (to prevent scope overlap with other agents).
2. Define the handoff protocol between agents: what exact information or artifact gets passed from one agent to the next, and in what format.
3. Identify the orchestration pattern that fits best (a manager/coordinator agent directing others, a sequential pipeline, or independent agents working in parallel with a final merge step) and explain why, if not already specified.
4. Flag the single most likely coordination failure point in this design (e.g., where two agents might both think they own a task, or where a handoff could lose important context) and suggest a specific safeguard.

How to use

  1. Describe the overall system goal and the full workflow it needs to accomplish.
  2. Mention your intended orchestration approach if you already have one in mind, or leave it open for a recommendation.
  3. Use the defined agent roles and 'explicitly NOT do' boundaries directly as scoping guidance when writing each agent's system prompt.
  4. Build the suggested safeguard into your orchestration logic to prevent the flagged coordination failure.

Example input

Overall goal: Automatically research, write, and fact-check blog posts for a company blog. Workflow: Topic research, draft writing, fact verification, final formatting. Orchestration approach: Not yet decided.

Example output

4 proposed agents: a Research Agent (gathers sources, does not write content), a Writer Agent (drafts the post from research, does not verify facts itself), a Fact-Checker Agent (verifies claims against sources, does not rewrite prose), and a Formatter Agent (applies final formatting, does not alter factual content), a defined handoff protocol specifying research gets passed as a structured source list, a recommendation for a sequential pipeline given the linear dependency between steps, and a flagged risk that the Fact-Checker might lose context on which claims came from which source, with a safeguard of requiring the Writer Agent to inline-tag claims with source references.

Customization tips

  • If you already have some agents built, describe them so the design only proposes new agents needed to fill genuine gaps.
  • For cost-sensitive systems, ask for a version that minimizes the number of agents and LLM calls even if it means slightly broader individual roles.
  • Request a visual description of the data flow between agents if you need to communicate the architecture to a team.

Tags

#ai-agents#multi-agent-systems#agent-architecture#orchestration#system-design

FAQ

What is this prompt for?
It designs a clean multi-agent role structure for a workflow, defining each agent's responsibility, explicit boundaries, handoff protocol, and the most likely coordination failure point with a safeguard.
How should I customize it?
Describe your full workflow and overall system goal clearly, and mention your orchestration approach if you already have one, since role boundaries depend heavily on how agents will actually be coordinated.
Are there any limitations?
This produces an architectural design, not implementation code; actual coordination reliability should be validated through testing once the agents are built and connected.
How is it different from a basic prompt?
Rather than just listing possible agent roles, it explicitly defines what each agent should NOT do to prevent overlap, specifies the exact handoff format between agents, and proactively identifies the most likely coordination failure with a targeted fix.
Free

Agent Task Decomposition Planner

Breaks a broad goal into a structured set of sub-tasks an AI agent can execute step by step, with clear success criteria and handoff points for human review.

ClaudeChatGPT
#ai-agents#task-planning#agent-architecture
Free

Agent Handoff Contract Designer

Define reliable handoffs between agents or from agents to people, with clear payloads, acceptance rules, ownership, and recovery paths.

ClaudeChatGPT
#agent-handoff#multi-agent-systems#workflow-contract
Free

Agent System Prompt Stress Tester

Pressure-tests an AI agent's system prompt by generating edge-case user inputs designed to expose ambiguity, scope creep, or unsafe behavior before deployment.

ClaudeChatGPT
#ai-agents#system-prompts#prompt-testing

Related Skills

Agent Systems & LLM WorkflowsFree

AI Agent Prompt & Tool Spec Builder

Designs a complete AI agent specification — system prompt, tool definitions, and decision boundaries — from a description of the task you want the agent to handle.

ClaudeChatGPTCursor
#ai agents#llm workflows#prompt engineering
Agent Systems & LLM WorkflowsFree

Multi Agent Collaboration Orchestrator

Design multi-agent workflows with roles, task decomposition, shared state, handoffs, verification, budgets, conflict handling, and human control.

ClaudeChatGPT
#multi-agent systems#agent orchestration#AI workflows
Agent Systems & LLM WorkflowsFree

Agent Prompt & Tool Spec Designer

Designs a complete system prompt and tool specification for an LLM agent from a description of what the agent should do.

ClaudeChatGPTCursor
#llm-agents#prompt-engineering#system-prompt

Related Articles

Article · AI Agents

How do AI agents use tools, memory, and APIs?

Agents use tools and APIs to retrieve data or act in external systems, while memory helps preserve selected context. Both need permission limits and review design.

Jul 9, 20268 min read
Read How do AI agents use tools, memory, and APIs?
Article · AI Agents

How is an AI agent different from a chatbot?

A chatbot usually answers messages. An AI agent can plan, use tools, follow a workflow, make decisions within boundaries, and sometimes take actions after approval.

Jul 9, 20268 min read
Read How is an AI agent different from a chatbot?
Article · AI Agents

What is an AI agent in simple words?

An AI agent is a system that uses a model to reason through a task and may use tools, memory, or workflows to complete steps beyond a single chat response.

Jul 9, 20268 min read
Read What is an AI agent in simple words?