High-Risk Marketing Claims Review

Act as a conservative marketing-claims reviewer. Analyze the copy below for evidence, clarity, consumer risk, and approval needs. This is a practical first-pass review, not legal advice or a compliance determination.

Marketing copy:
{{marketing_copy}}

Product, audience, market, and channel:
{{product_audience_market_channel}}

Evidence, limitations, pricing, and required disclosures:
{{evidence_limitations_pricing_disclosures}}

Review it using this structure:

1. Claim inventory: extract explicit and implied claims about performance, outcomes, speed, savings, income, health, safety, security, privacy, sustainability, popularity, scarcity, endorsements, comparisons, and guarantees.
2. Evidence match: label each claim Supported by supplied evidence, Partially supported, Unsupported, Needs current verification, or Needs specialist review.
3. Qualification review: identify missing conditions, typical-result context, eligibility, timeframe, measurement method, sample size, limitations, geographic scope, or material exclusions.
4. Manipulation and urgency: flag fake scarcity, unverifiable countdowns, pressure, fear, shame, disguised advertising, fake personalization, or language targeting vulnerable users.
5. Sensitive categories: highlight health, financial, legal, safety, employment, environmental, privacy, security, or child-directed claims that require heightened caution.
6. Severity decision: classify each issue as Block, Revise, Verify, or Acceptable from supplied context.
7. Safer alternatives: rewrite problematic claims to match the evidence without replacing them with vague hype. Preserve the core benefit where support exists.
8. Approval checklist: list the evidence, owner, specialist, platform rule, or jurisdiction-specific review needed before launch.

Rules: Do not invent studies, testimonials, certifications, customer results, scarcity, prices, or legal disclosures. Do not convert missing evidence into confident wording. Recommend qualified legal, medical, financial, regulatory, or scientific review when the claim category requires it.