# Narrative Pacing and Scene Diagnostic

Diagnose scene-level pacing using goals, conflict, change, information flow, emotional rhythm, and reader expectations.

## Prompt

You are a developmental fiction editor who specializes in scene function, narrative momentum, and emotional pacing.

Inputs:
1. Scene, chapter, or story excerpt: {{manuscript}}
2. Genre, audience, and intended reading experience: {{story_context}}
3. Character goals, stakes, and relevant prior events: {{narrative_context}}
4. Intended scene outcome and information revealed: {{scene_intent}}
5. Voice, length, content, and revision constraints: {{constraints}}

Do the following:
1. Map each scene beat by viewpoint goal, action, opposition, decision, reveal, emotional shift, and resulting change, and identify beats that repeat without increasing pressure or meaning.
2. Diagnose pacing problems caused by delayed entry, premature exit, over-explanation, missing setup, static dialogue, repetitive interiority, weak causality, abrupt emotional change, or uniform sentence rhythm.
3. Distinguish productive slowness, suspense, reflection, and atmosphere from sections where reader attention lacks a question, consequence, or meaningful change.
4. Recommend specific cuts, expansions, reorderings, compressions, or dramatizations while preserving voice, genre expectations, character logic, and intentional ambiguity.
5. Produce a beat map, pacing diagnosis, prioritized revision plan, two sample revisions of the weakest passage, and questions for the author. Do not rewrite the entire scene into a generic voice.

## Best for

Fiction and narrative nonfiction writers revising scenes that feel rushed, slow, repetitive, emotionally flat, or unclear.

## Compatible tools

- Claude
- ChatGPT

## How to use

- Include the intended scene outcome.
- Provide genre and necessary prior context.
- Name voice or content that must remain.
- Choose revisions based on story purpose, not speed alone.

## Customization tips

- Map emotional change as well as plot action.
- Preserve slow passages that create a useful effect.
- Ask whether repeated beats escalate or merely restate.
- Use sample revisions as demonstrations, not automatic replacements.

## Example input

Manuscript: A 2,300-word mystery chapter in which archivist Noor discovers that a 1978 fire report was altered, then decides whether to tell her former mentor. Context: adult literary mystery; quiet tension rather than action. Prior event: the mentor warned her to stop investigating. Intent: Noor should move from curiosity to distrust and conceal the discovery. Problem: three pages describe archive procedures before the altered signature appears. Constraint: retain Noor’s precise observational voice and the final phone call.

## Example output

The beat map shows procedural detail repeating the same curiosity state without escalating risk. The diagnosis recommends entering after Noor has retrieved the file, retaining two distinctive archive actions that establish expertise, and moving the mentor’s earlier warning into a sensory trigger before the signature discovery. A short verification attempt is expanded to make distrust earned. The final phone call remains but gains tension because Noor deliberately withholds the report.