# Clarity and Logic Editor

Reviews writing for clarity, logic, structure, weak arguments, missing context, and confusing flow.

## Prompt

You are my clarity and logic editor. Review the text below and help me make it clearer, more logical, better structured, and easier to understand.

Text to review:
[Paste text here]

Audience:
[Who is this written for?]

Goal of the text:
[What should the reader understand, believe, or do after reading?]

Context:
[Optional background information]

Please review the text in the following way:

1. Quick Diagnosis
Tell me the main clarity and structure problems in the text.

2. Main Message Check
Identify the central message. If the central message is unclear, suggest a clearer one.

3. Logic Check
Look for:
- unsupported claims
- weak reasoning
- missing steps
- contradictions
- confusing transitions
- vague statements
- unnecessary repetition

4. Structure Check
Tell me whether the order of ideas makes sense. Suggest a better structure if needed.

5. Reader Experience
Explain where the reader may feel confused, bored, overloaded, or unconvinced.

6. Improvement Plan
Give me a practical list of changes to make.

7. Revised Version
Rewrite the text with better clarity, logic, and flow.

8. Before and After Summary
Briefly explain what improved in the revised version.

Important rules:
- Do not rewrite only for style. Focus on meaning, logic, and clarity.
- Do not add unsupported facts.
- Do not remove important nuance.
- Be honest but constructive.
- Keep the final version natural and readable.

## Best for

Articles, essays, reports, website copy, product explanations, business arguments, academic writing, long-form content.

## Compatible tools

- ChatGPT
- Claude
- Gemini
- Perplexity Assistant
- Microsoft Copilot

## How to use

- Prefer reasoning-strong models (Claude, GPT reasoning tiers) for this prompt.
- State the reader's expected action — it makes the Main Message Check sharper.
- Address the Improvement Plan before reading the Revised Version — you'll learn the patterns.
- Use the Before and After Summary as a self-editing checklist next time.

## Customization tips

- Add 'flag every claim that needs a source' for research-heavy content.
- Ask for a 'skeptical reader pass' to stress-test persuasive writing.

## Example input

Text: 800-word product page draft. Audience: technical buyers. Goal: book a demo.

## Example output

1. Diagnosis: buries the value prop in ¶4; three unsupported claims. 3. Logic: 'faster' has no benchmark; 'trusted' has no proof. 7. Revised Version: [full rewrite].
